I take nothing on face value and I have an uncanny ability to read the nature of an individual. Most often my ‘reads’ on individuals are quite accurate, not only do I see flaws, but I see potential. Usually traditional math teachers are dry when teaching mathematics. More often than not their understanding of a mathematical subject is very formulaic, steeped in tradition, possessing no innovation and they often become as dry as the formulas they teach. Emblem makes math breath, bleed, cry, smile and laugh. I make math human. Tailor making a style to fit the individual learning mathematics is my strong point. During the time that I have been familiar with high level mathematics I have run across students inwhich I knew their motives, whether their motives were self seeking or humanitarian, I could read into them. Never have I discriminated against those that were seeking to learn. Giving him or her a chance to clean themselves up regardless of their initial motives is what being the said person of that ability is all about. I teach all persons equally and according to their abilities at the time. As an enlightener it is my goal to assist the individual in realizing his or her potential. I have become a better enlightener over the years, months, and days of building with individuals. Wisdom cipher years ago my first generation of students exemplified the rambunctious energy of pre-schoolers and as a young math enlightener I was without seasoning, lacking experience. The lack of experience forced me to learn how to enlighten by way of trial and error. ‘Baptized by fire’ is probably the best way to describe my early years as an enlightener, fortunately my style of mathematical enlightenment has become better with age. Many math enlighteners call their students their ‘Fruit’, this is a term I shy away from, because I feel it creates an ‘underling’ syndrome in which I will have no part. Enlivening a young person’s mind is my duty as a civilized person, not relegating them to ‘Fruit’. My record of enlightenment is not perfect in the sense that one might traditionally view ‘perfection’. I have had disagreements with students in the past as well as graduates from my mathematical chambers that have gone on to live out their own ideals of what they feel is right and exact. The style of my instruction is arguably one of the best. Why? I deal with tradition but without becoming roped and bound by it. Supreme Mathematics is forever innovative, creating realm after realm, branch after branch, potentially one day rivaling in ‘applications’ the math classes of Ivy-league professors. An academic applicable approach to becoming living mathematics is the quantitative and qualitative difference in my approach compared to some, by this I mean that math covers all that is subjective and can be related to every area of human activity, as well as non human activity. Supreme Mathematicians in the past have fallen victim to being stereotyped and dismissed to cult status. Breaking out of that stereotype is the theme of my particular school of thought. The establishment of Supreme mathematics as a legitimate social science is paramount in my mind. Coming to North America alone has established Supreme Math as a ‘Bymyself’/Personal science, and with coherent application of living mathematics as well as the future synthesis into the various branches of math, Supreme Math can rise to the height of a great advocated group science in the very near future.
Single handedly dismantling the deficient ideas of whole numbers being collapsed into a singularity is what I am most proud of in my contributions to this living science, it puts those that deal with mathematics back on course toward understanding the various branches of math from an academic standpoint, and at the same time not separating 120 or the Supreme Alphabet from trigonometry, algebra, calculus etc.. By interweaving the myriad of ideas in 120 and combining it with text book math will usher the 5% into the reality of truly teaching civilization to all the human family.
Presently I am working on the Hafiz Project, a project that will embody body translation in exegesis of the Holy Quran. The Hafiz project seeks to dismantle the fears and phobias that many who subscribe to this mathematical culture have as it pertains to the orthodoxy. 120 is a context for us in North America, and we expand the context by doing the knowledge on all cultures throughout the world. Many amongst us have the last name Allah, but fail to fully appreciate the book in which the name is proclaimed the most. This to me is tacitly hypocritical, pseudo Islamic, and reeks of the Nation of Gods And Earths splinter group stigma. The Hafiz project is the first attempt to bring us as a Nation of age internationally, and hopefully will produce an international etiquette in dealing with the human family. You can’t teach the human family if you are unaware of their customs.Drawing up 120, Supreme Alphabet and Supreme Math has been and absolutely mind blowing experience. Those who are meant to ride this space ship will ride it, those who won't-won't.