For the past month I've been reading both of Stephen Hawking's books: 'A Brief History of Time' and 'The Grand Design'. Both books have proven to be fascinating explorations into the realm of physics and theoretical physics, and needless to say, Stephen Hawking uses all equality ounces of his grafted brain to show and prove some very compelling ideas in the field of quantum physics. Reading his books have helped me better understand the process of 'three stages of darkness' in a more scientifically detailed manner, allowing me to better appreciate the beauty of physics and the sheer majesty of pure mathematics. If I were to study any religion it would be pure mathematics and physics. I'd be humbly devoted to a religion of math and physics just as a Jew who studies the Torah, a Christian who studies the Bible, and a Muslim who studies the Quran.
I finished 'A Grand Design' at 5:17 a.m. this morning, rolling crippled ass Stephen every step of the way over the Hot Arabian Desert of the mind. Me and that white boy had a very interesting conversation at the turn of each and every page. I will go so far as to say that I have never had a more enthralling and stimulating read regarding the subjects of three stages of darkness; the concept of no beginning nor ending; quantum mechanics; quantum physics; and intelligent design since I've had knowledge wisdom cipher. The book builds on the history of physics for Europeans and how they finally grasped the nature of space-time nine years before 1914. I was sparked for over 400 pages: approximately 200 pages per book.
Stephen didn't take the Mystery God out of the equation completely, instead he put the idea of the Mystery God in context, mentioning the Boshongo people of Central 'Africa' and their fable of creation in how they believe that, in the beginning there was darkness, water and The Great God 'Bumba'. Bumba had a stomach ache and vomited up the sun. The sun dried up the water leaving land. Bumba still had a stomach ache and regurgitated the moon, stars, leopards, turtles, elephants, and finally, man. Hawking also mentioned the Mayan myth in which The creator is simply referred to as 'The Maker'! He said that 'The Maker' was unhappy because there was no one to praise him so he made the Earth, mountains, trees, all animals and since the animals could not speak 'The Maker' made man from mud and Earth. Regardless of the myth, all human cultures have pondered their creation, and the nature of their existence. These first fables by the Original Man were attempts to understand his origin in this world. The Egyptians, the Ethiopians, Greeks, Romans, Babylonians etc., all had a creation mythology. As God and Earth our first degree deals with God being a Blackman who is a Maker, an Owner, Cream, a Father, and ultimately God. Man cannot have a scientific conversation as it pertains to creation without some sort of a God as the first cause, whether one understands God as a man, a disembodied spook, or a set of natural laws, 'First Cause' must be addressed.
Instead of arguing about a Mystery God, Stephen Hawking relegates the idea of God to Natural Scientific Laws which he defines as 'Scientific Determinism'. He does not attempt to erase God, he merely says that how we understand this so-called Mystery God should be in the light of pure scientific and physical law. As I read I was smirking to myself because the crippled colored man was dealing with the highest peak of his grafted equality. However, at certain points, I disagreed with Hawking. Boldly, I challenged the world's most famous physicist since Einstein and I will indeed voice my own theoretical ideas as they pertain to physics before the end of this writing.
My
First Point of Contention in which I fundamentally differ with Hawking, and the global physics community is over a small, b.u.t. never the less very critical point. Their idea of the Big Bang is correct to a limit and it is this model of the Big Bang in which I have an issue. The Big Bang occurred 13.7 Billion years ago and physicist mark this moment as 'the beginning' of space time, however in my view the 'Big Bang was not the 'beginning' at all. It was merely a very powerful explosion in space- time stemming from unimaginable temperatures, and unfathomable density. In grappling with the density of this supposed first super atom I began to refute the level of density that Western Physicist propose. They fit the entire mass of the known Universe in an atom at this singular point in time. Extreme density within a relatively small space is a proven fact in physics and I agree with it to a certain extent. It is important to understand that a great deal of energy was indeed concentrated at an infinitesimal point and was a major factor in the initial causation of the Big Bang. However, I hardly believe that 'all' the energy/matter in the known and unknown regions of the universe were present at a singular point. 'All' mass did not begin at the point of the Big Bang as Hawking's model suggest *(will explain later at some point in this writing).
Second Point of Contention Space has always been space. There is no such thing as 'spacelessness', meaning 'space time' didn't begin at the point of the Big Bang: the universe did. Furthermore, intelligence resides in the fabric of 'Space Time'. Again, the fundamental error of Western Physics in my opinion is in their model of the 'Big Bang'. Hawking and the Western Physics' model of the universe as a Balloon that has been filled-up with vast energy and matter is not right and exact. I reject the inflationary balloon model of the Big Bang because it implies that 'space' began at that point, failing to take into consideration that eternal size and eternal dimensions are forever present. The Western model also fails to acknowledge the 'host' which is 'eternal space'-'space' that predated the universe as well as a Big Bang which at its best was in my view, a mere 'Medium Bang'. My theory is that this 'Medium Bang' started a chain reaction in space-a 'space' already filled with dark energy and dark matter existing on a quantum level as matter and anti-matter. Many physicist blindly presume that gravity, strong nuclear, electo-magnetism, and weak nuclear forces had some secret meeting, exploded and consequently inflated what we have come to understand as the cosmos. They place this incredible burden on one atom, and in my view the 'Big Bang' breaks down as a theory when one realizes that this so-called 'First Atom' is brutally over-worked and very clumsy in a theoretical sense. In a 'Medium Bang' scenario an explosion occurs, releases it's mass, and enlivens the Dark energy that has forever been present on the quantum level. There was no new matter/energy created at that moment and I refuse to believe that this explosion defined as the 'Big Bang' spontaneously made the four fundamental forces fuse as one within the heat of this quantum and cosmological genesis. The four forces were 'one' from the door. Yes, potential energy was released, it spread into the cosmos and that portion of the Big Bang model is accurate. This release of energy along with the tiniest quantum particles that innately occupy space time account for all the matter we see in this Universe estimated at 159 Billion light years across and still expanding-expanding into what? Space! Pure Black Space! Space that was eternal to begin with and remains eternal now.
Edwin Hubble in 1929 published his findings, stating that the galaxies are receding further away from observation and concluded that the universe is expanding at an accelerated rate. I agree with the idea of the Universe's expansion however the Universe is not expanding in a 'rubber' balloon into 'newly made' spatial territory. The Universe is expanding within space, and distinct from 'Space': The universe does not accommodate space-space accommodates the universe. The balloon model of the Big Bang denotes boundaries, walls, edges and constraints in which eternal space has none. The Universe is expanding into space that has been forever present(no beginning nor ending). The model of an expanding universe that Hawking's puts forth is flawed in that it does not take into account that there is no such thing as 'Spacelessness'. Western Physics looks at the universe absent of contrast, meaning they only see the white squares on a chessboard and not the black squares. The implication that the Big Bang is somehow expanding in a 'balloon' framework into empty meaningless space is an emphatic 'Now Cipher'! Space has no point of beginning and no point of ending. Eternity is the most difficult concept for a finite being such as man to wrap his mind around because unlike eternity, Man has a beginning and an ending. Finitum cannot comprehend Infinitum.
I postulate intelligence as natural law residing in every nuance of space's fabric. To search for Dark Energy, Dark Matter and anti-matter is why The Space Shuttle Endeavor was launched last Tuesday. NASA went into Space to examine Dark Matter/ Dark Energy and Anti-Matter. Why? This Dark Matter is what I have in numerous writings in the past defined as Black Mind: Is Dark Energy and Dark Matter actual 'Mind'? Indeed! NASA didn't spend Multi Billions of dollars to look at empty nothingness. Huge amounts of space time are being studied to attempt to better understand the reality of existence. Satellites have detected something that can only be described as Dark Energy present in the fabric of space, bending light, and showing and proving gravitation which is proof of a substantive reality.
Before I go into quantum mechanics and deeper into theoretical physics it is important that reference pointz be laid for further scientific discourse . Over the last 2000 years, particularly for Europeans, physics has proved to be an interesting journey. Kudos to Hawking for an entertaining view of explaining the growth of Europeans in the field of physics.
A Very Brief History Of Physics:
It was Aristole who put his wisdom before his knowledge. He surmised that the 'Earth' was at the center of the Universe. Ptolemy was an Astronomer in the first century who elevated above Aristotle as he peeped the pattern of the paths of the planets in a somewhat accurate fashion, b.u.t. his understanding of the manner of their orbits was incorrect-he too dealt with wisdom knowledge, thinking all planets had orbits composed of wild elliptical retrogrades. The historical narrative of Europeans attempting to figure out shit is comedy, b.u.t. we must give credit where credit is due: Europeans are indeed some persistent movafuckuz. Ptolemy figured out how to predict any position of a planet at any given time, however, he too postulated that the Earth was at the center of the Solar System. It took over a thousand years before the colored man realized that the Earth is not at the center of the Universe.
Nicholas Copernicus finally figured out that the Earth was not at the center of the Solar System. In 1543 Copernicus wrote a born cipher cipher king entitled 'De Revotionibus Orbium Coelestium' or 'Revolutions of Celestial Spheres'. The colored dude Copernicus was so 'shook' of reprisal and potential fall-out from the Catholic Church that he didn't have it published until the year he returned back to essence. The Catholic Church said the book contradicted the Bible. Leave it to the religious minded to halt scientific progress. Stephen Hawking goes hard in the paint with these historical narratives in the Chapter entitled 'What Is Reality' in his book 'A Grand Design', admitting that during the compilation of the Bible, Europeans still thought the Earth was flat. There was no peace amongst the Europeans as they argued back and forth for nearly a hundred years. The European is relatively a 'new being' to this Earth, and during the 1600's was still finding his bearings.
In 1633 the Catholic Church put Galileo on trial, accusing him of heresy because he agreed with Copernicus in that the Earth was not the center of the Universe. The Catholic Church found Galileo guilty and sentenced him to house arrest for the rest of his life and didn't officially pardoned Galileo until 1992 long after his death.
The Church wrote an official declaration which stated something to the affect,
"Dear Galileo,
You were right and we were wrong. The Earth is not at the center of the solar system. My bad Dawg!
Yours Truly,
The Pope"
Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727). He developed three laws of motion and a law of gravity which accounted for the orbits of the Earth, Moon, and planets. Using a pure mathematical framework he showed and proved the reality of gravity. Newton was mad nice with Mathematics. Most Original people would like to think that the Colored man stole shit and true indeed-the colored man stole the whole Goddamn planet. Newton however was a pussy ass, nerd ass white boy who was neither a conqueror nor a soldier, never setting foot in what the devil call's Africa so he didn't steal a Goddamn thing. He was just sharp with mathematics. Newton returned to essence in 1727 and 178 years later in 1905, Einstein set the world of Physics on fire with a paper entitled 'Special Relativity'. In the paper he stated 'Time' was not absolute as Newton had postulated. Einstein stated True I Master Equal can not be treated as separate from space. This is why 'disciplined' physicist state the phrase 'Space-Time', instead of 'space and time'. Nine years before 1914 the colored man figured out that space and time are in fact one in the same, bringing me back to my original point: If there is no beginning nor ending as our born degree states, it implies that there is no such idea as 'spacelessness'. Emblem's theory of the 'Imposibility of spacelessness' suggest that the 'Big Bang' did not effectively create what can abstractly be defined as 'new space' or 'more space', nor is the Universe encapsulated, or enveloped in a primordial expanding balloon that is somehow distinct from the fabric of space-time as the present model of the Big Bang would have us believe.
Yes, there was an explosion of immense magnitude, heat and density. There was a blast radius of course, but again: no 'new space' and thus there are no boundaries or edges to the Universe's expansion. There is tremendous truth in the old '5 Percenta' adage 'No Ledge' . Space is completely eternal with 'no ledges'. All potential energy is present in every nook and cranny of space and thus on a quantum level energy is ever present in the face of that which appears to the naked eye to be empty.
Initially, Einstein didn't agree with the idea of the 'Big Bang', he believed in a theory of the Universe that Physicist defined as 'Steady State'. Upon further evidence Einstein recanted and changed his mind and unconsciously proved the Big Bang in his General Theory of Relativity. The individual who drew up the idea of the explosion of this super atom that caused the Big Bang was a Professor of Physics who was also a Roman Catholic Priest, his name was Georges Lemaitre. He proposed in 1927 the theory of the Big Bang. Einstein and the rest of the Physics' community rejected it as bullshit, suggesting that Lemaitre's Math was Flawless but that his Physics were abominable.
I find it interesting that during this time Master Wallace Fard was locked up in San Quinten when all this shit was a hot topic. I'm quite sure Fard was reading his issue of Scientific Quarterly in the prison library, because out of nowhere, in a ghetto in D-Mecca in 1934 Fard's prize student Elijah is building on very abstract ideas in regard to it taking Allah 6 trillion years to go to war with three stages of darkness and construct the first atom. In retrospect 6 trillion years is interesting, 'unprovable', b.u.t. 'Interesing', especially when you consider that energy/matter exist on a quantum level in what appears to be empty space and how eons of time have had to have passed to pull together sufficient quantum mass to yield such immense density. 6 trillion years is indeed plausible. Logically the atom's weight caused space to warp, bringing more and more quantum mass to a point-not all quantum mass b.u.t. enough to cause a 'medium bang'. Georges Lemaitre was ahead of the curve by 7 years b.u.t. Elijah was on the ass of Lemaitre and the Physics world with only a forth grade education, one hundred and twenty lessons and he didn't even have a goddamn telescope.
Edwin Hubble in 1925 saw through his telescope that Galaxies were moving away from one another and him and the physics world concluded based on the 'Candle Light' equation' and the degree of luminosity of a star the distance between stars, and their motion allowing them to see that the Universe was indeed expanding from a point of an explosive origin, supporting Georges Lemaitre's theory of the Big Bang. The Big Bang wasn't fully proven and accepted until 1967 when two scientist: Arnold Pensious and Bob Wilson working at Bell Labs determined that the static we see and hear on our television sets is nothing more than the resonance, radiation, and residual echoes from the Big Bang or Allah's Self Creation from three stages of darkness borning the Universe. To 'keep it real', Elijah was ahead of the entire Physics community in terms of what he knew to be true and he died with way more loot than nearly the entire world of Physics. By 1967 Elijah had already been dealing with the first atom theory for 33 years. Georges Lemaitre brought it up first b.u.t. Elijah was on it hard, teaching it to Original people in a theological context.
So who is Stephen Hawking and why is he so relevant and ground breaking? What is the Unified Field Theory? What is the Theory of Everything? What are the Four fundamental forces of the Universe? And what do all these Nerd White Boyz mean with all this Quantum Mechanics bullshit?
First, before we go into Stephen we have to mention that in 1915 Einstein revised Special Relativity with General relativity, adding that gravity worked the way it does because space-time curves in the presence of matter. Just as batons are passed from one runner to another runner at a track and field event the baton of Gravity (Quantum Gravity) are Stephen's Hawking's Baton handed to him by Einstein. Gravity is another point in which I differ with Hawking.
Light cannot escape the force of gravity and thus bends and shifts in the face of gravity. All objects as they act in space, warp the fabric of space time, to what extent: depends upon the mass of the object. General Relativity points to the fact that the Universe is indeed expanding. Why? Because if Mass warps space, it would eventually bring things together and ultimately to a conclusive end. So by virtue of Einstein's theory of relativity we can logically infer expansion, leading to the conclusion that the known Universe began from The Big Bang or that a primordial atom that exploded from three stages of darkness.
There are multiple problems with the general model of the Big Bang though it is in principle correct. It is said that at '10' to the negative power of 43rd (10^-43/sec) of a second that the temperature of the initial explosion reached heats as hot as 100 million, trillion, trillion, degrees and then one Saturday Night hot temperatures nudged gravity to start dancing. I do believe that in the beginning the explosion was unfathomably hot, however I strongly refute the idea that 'Gravity' began at this point. In My theory of eternal time by virtue of eternal space (No Beginning nor ending) the fact that space has been forever present means that gravity has also been forever present. The explosion did happen indeed b.u.t. it did not create 'space' or 'gravity'. Gravity and 'Space' did not have a finite beginning, meaning both 'Gravity' and 'Space' did not begin at the moment of the big bang, it was the Universe that began.
If there has always been space-time there has always been gravity. Gravity is integral with space. The notion of Zero gravity is a failure because in what appears to be empty space quantum mass exist curving infinitesimal pockets of space to some degree. The first atom could not have been present in spacelessness, and nor could such an intense explosion occur in 'spacelessness'. Again: space has always been present. The explosion occurred on/in/upon/ and from the fabric of pure 'black-black-black' space itself. 13.7 Billion years ago marks a time and a point in which incredibly large and dense quantities of massive energy were condensed into and unfathomable and infinitesimally small atomic vehicle. This 'Black Black Black'(B^3) energy that NASA and Quantum Physicist have defined as Dark-Matter is in my theory the nature of space A.K.A 'The Black Mind' and the Black Mind has always been in existence and forever in possession of The Strong Nuclear force that hold protons, neutrons and quarks together; This Black Black Black Energy or Dark Matter has always been in possession of Weak Nuclear Forces which construct elements at the center of stars; This Black Black Black Energy has always been in possession of electromagnetism which provides all charges for atomic particles. Stephen Hawking and every Physicist on the planet are looking for an elegant theory that combines all four forces as a Unified Field Theory. The Problem is is that their searching at a finite point of Origin for Forces that Have eternally resided In Dark Matter and in the Fabric of Black Space Time itself. Essentially, Stephen Hawking and all his fellow grafted six ounces of brain-brainiacs will never find a Finite beginning for an Eternal Force if they continue to myopically search the origin of One singular explosion that occurred 13.7 Billion years ago. They assume that such was the first explosion of it's kind. It is my theory that if there is no beginning nor ending than explosions such as what we call the Big Bang occurs rather frequently in the Eternal scope of trillions upon trillions of years.
The Unified field theory is on the four right angles of the square which is the truth. I cee it, b.u.t. let them Keep searching for Trillionz. The Black Mind Manifest as The Black Man which Born God everlasting to everlasting,
Peace
Da God EMBLEM
